Did Kamala Actually Win a Single State Fairly? The Stats Uncover a Different Story—Did Trump Achieve a Reagan-Style Victory, Only to Face a 40-Year-Advanced Fraud Machine with CCP Backing?
➡Some Experts Believe the Scale Was Tipped in Key States: An In-Depth Look at the Statistics, Security Concerns, and the Startling Improbability of Harris’s Wins in States with Lenient ID Laws.
by Nadine Safron and Ava G.
Note to Readers:
Sure, the mainstream media (MSM) wants you to believe that in 2020, a candidate who spent most of his campaign season in his basement somehow won more votes than any president in history. Meanwhile, when he did show up, his "rallies" looked more like small gatherings. So, it’s no surprise that the left will try to explain away the analysis that follows—they’ll tell you it’s baseless, conspiracy-laden, or try to bury it under noise. But that’s what they do best: obfuscate the truth.
With that in mind, let’s dive into the data and see what the numbers really tell us—because numbers do not lie!
Introduction: Unpacking a Suspicious Pattern in the 2024 Election—Things That Make You Go “Hmmm?!”
Newsmax recently raised an intriguing question: "Is there a theme among the states Harris won?" After examining the data, a startling pattern emerges: Harris won exclusively in states with either no voter ID requirement or only non-photo IDs. For those focused on election integrity, this finding is more than a curiosity—it’s a statistical anomaly demanding serious scrutiny.
In this analysis, we break down what this pattern could mean for everyday Americans, data enthusiasts, and national security experts. We also look at how a 40-year evolution of election manipulation techniques may have played a role—strategies that, according to leading fraud expert Jay Valentine, have been perfected to an unprecedented level.
For the Layperson: Why Should You Care?
Voter ID requirements are fundamental to election integrity. Think of them as the “guest list” to the voting “party.” Without ID checks, anyone could show up—uninvited and unverified. When Harris’s wins occurred only in states with weak ID laws, it’s like having a party where only “open-door” guests are allowed—a sign that something might be amiss. Of course, a secure event needs more than just a guest list; it also relies on protections like security at the door (poll monitoring and ballot security) and checking registrations at entry. But without ID checks, the election “party” may not have had the tightest guest list, so to speak.
For the Statistics Buffs: The Astounding Improbability
Now, let’s dive into the numbers:
Probability of This Pattern Being Coincidental: Out of 50 states, approximately half (25) require a photo ID, and the remaining 25 either don’t require an ID or accept non-photo ID.
Improbability of Winning Only in Non-Photo ID States: Assuming each state has an equal likelihood of requiring photo ID or not, the probability of Harris winning exclusively in non-photo ID states (20 out of her 20 wins, represented as (1/2)^20) is approximately 1 in 1,048,576, or 0.000095%.
What a 1-in-a-Million Chance Really Means: In statistical terms, this is far beyond an ordinary outlier—it suggests an unusual structural pattern, or perhaps manipulation. When statisticians see patterns like these, they look for systemic causes, just as they would investigate if an airline crashed only on specific days.
Other Indicators of Systemic Issues: Experts in data science, like Jay Valentine—founder of Omega4America and a key contributor to fraud detection systems for entities like eBay and the TSA—argue that such patterns may not be random. Valentine’s team has applied advanced quantum analysis to voter rolls, uncovering systematic anomalies in 26 states that point to “ballot manufacturing”—the strategic creation and usage of anomalous voter identities. This practice, according to Valentine, has been honed over decades.
Note: The analysis and conclusions presented here are based on the assumptions that Newsmax's map accurately reflects the voter ID requirements in the states Harris won. Any discrepancies in the map's data could impact these findings.
For National Security Experts: Why This Matters for Democracy
From a national security perspective, patterns like these aren’t just statistics; they’re vulnerabilities in our democratic process. Here’s what Harris’s pattern of wins in no-ID or non-photo ID states could imply:
Foreign Influence Through Weak Points: States with minimal ID requirements are inherently more vulnerable to external manipulation. As Valentine highlights, entities aiming to destabilize the U.S. could exploit these gaps.
Internal Subversion and the "Silent War": Election manipulation is often less about hacking machines and more about leveraging systemic weaknesses. By concentrating “wins” in these states, there’s a possibility of orchestrated control over outcomes, as warned by security and fraud detection professionals.
A Need for Rigorous Oversight: Historically, election security has focused on external threats, but this data suggests a need to examine domestic vulnerabilities as well. Addressing these gaps isn’t just about election integrity—it’s a national defense issue.
A Tease for President Trump: FREE Technology to Stop Fraud
President Trump, my sister Francine—a leading expert in Machine Learning Programming, Data Science, Data Engineering, AI-driven wargaming, unrestricted warfare, and strategic simulation modeling—can guide you on using groundbreaking technology to virtually eliminate fraud in future elections, ensuring every legitimate vote counts. Such technology can be implemented quickly, with the capacity to detect and prevent fraud in real-time, leveraging both national security and AI-driven strategic expertise.
A Call for Investigation and Action
Did Trump Actually Achieve a Reagan-Style Victory, Only to Be Undermined by a Perfected, 40-Year-Entrenched Fraud System that Has Grown Even More Advanced?
Regrettably, many left-leaning wins in the Senate and House merit a closer look, as sophisticated fraud detection algorithms reveal statistical anomalies in states with weak ID verification protocols. These irregularities aren’t just statistical quirks; they hint at potential structural issues within our democratic process. States lacking robust ID laws become ripe for manipulation.
Jay Valentine, founder of Omega4America and known for his fraud detection systems, emphasizes that these irregularities often align with “ballot manufacturing.” By his account, Democrats have been refining these techniques for 30+ years, and by our account, with CCP support.
Given these patterns and Valentine’s findings, it’s no wonder many Americans are left wondering: Did this election outcome accurately reflect voter intent?
Conclusion: Ensuring a Truly Secure Election System
The unexpected win patterns have left many Americans questioning whether this election might have resembled a Reagan- or Nixon-style landslide had only verified votes been counted. Public sentiment, reflected in Elon Musk’s large-scale, non-scientific pre-election poll, pointed toward a different outcome. The improbable pattern of Harris’s victories underscores the urgent need for transparency, thorough investigation, and immediate reforms to protect future elections.
A secure election system is not a luxury but a foundational necessity. It’s time for leaders to step up, champion transparency, apply rigorous oversight, and protect the democratic process at its core.
Because in America, every vote should count—and only legitimate votes should decide our future.
For Conspiracy Theorists or Just Inquisitive Readers
CALL ME CRAZY – BUT HERE’S MY SHOOT-FROM-THE-HIP, NON-SCIENTIFIC HYPOTHESIS
Based on statistical improbabilities and historical voting trends, particularly with respect to down-ballot voting patterns in a presidential election year, I’m taking a wild guess here::
Senate Races: There may be as many as 3-4 Senate seats in non-photo ID states with results that defy expectations, indicating potential anomalies.
House Races: Roughly 20-30 House seats in these same states show similar deviations, where the winning party doesn’t align with the presidential outcome—contrary to typical down-ballot voting patterns.
If Trump’s team wishes to investigate, we have the capability to coordinate a skilled team equipped with the technology and expertise to provide immediate support as soon as the final races close out. This includes documented instances of fraud in areas where outcomes are in question, as well as an outline of how we arrived at the estimates mentioned. (Why so secretive? Some methods are best kept under wraps to prevent the opposition from adapting their tactics.)
Further Reading: A New Breed of Defender – J.D. Vance, America's Patriots, and the Fight Against Senate Saboteurs
As we examine the critical issues surrounding election integrity and the forces that may have influenced the outcome, it’s essential to recognize that the fight doesn’t end with securing votes alone. If Rick Scott does not secure the Senate leadership role with Trump’s endorsement, we risk having the Senate fall into the hands of those who would sideline the America First agenda and suppress the voices of millions of patriots. Fortunately, there is hope: a new generation of resolute defenders, led by J.D. Vance, is rising to confront these challenges head-on.
Read more about how J.D. Vance, along with a wave of loyal patriots—including you—can stand firm against internal Senate saboteurs by calling your senators, urging governors to form the Civilian Defense Coalition, and ensuring that the will of the people is safeguarded. Link to article: A New Breed of Defender: J.D. Vance, America's Patriots, and the Fight Against Senate Saboteurs
#ElectionIntegrity
#SecureElections
#AmericaFirst
#FraudDetection
#Election2024
#NationalSecurity
#StopTheFraud
#TechForTruth
#VoterID
#DataScience
#AIForGood
#MachineLearning
#StrategicSimulation
#ProtectTheVote
#CCPInfluence
#UnrestrictedWarfare
#TransparencyNow
#SaveAmerica
#EveryVoteCounts
The presidency is nothing if there’s gridlock in Congress hence the need to cheat. We are the only nation that could ridiculously conceive of allowing voting without ID.
It stands to reason that, after committing fraudulent elections now for decades, the Communist Left weren't about to hold back in 2024, when everything they've been treasonously scheming for, came down to this one election against Trump. I would bet the farm that, at least in their minds, they went all-in this time around.
Those patterns that you mentioned are undoubtedly telltale signs of their election rigging. The biggest problem is, that they are still in power, and so who's going to seriously contest them? All the three-letter agencies are neatly tucked away in their deep pockets. A good number of judges are, as well.
They've made it possible to get away with everything without being held accountable. I never thought I'd see a day when physical evidence doesn't mean a damn thing anymore. But here we are.
Do we know If they fabricated those "bomb scares" to the polling stations at the most convenient times imaginable, during election day? Perhaps the counts weren't quite what they had anticipated in order to fill enough house seats, and so maybe they thought a good hour or two for them to level-up the playing field was in order.
Am I accusaional? Absolutely. Don't I have a right to be? Don't we all have a right to be?
Honestly, how much can we possibly take as we witness them ripping away at the major arteries of our Constitution every single day, with reckless abandon?
I used to believe in giving the benefit of the doubt, but not anymore. At 59, maybe I've become jaded, who knows. If I am, it's because they're the ones who made me that way.
But I know that, at this critical stage, it's do or die. We can't make any mistakes, and we need to scrutinize every single move they make. If they yell back in protest, then we need to scream over them.
No more "silent" majority. It's time to take charge. This is gloves-off time. This is OUR country, not theirs.