➡Some Experts Believe the Scale Was Tipped in Key States: An In-Depth Look at the Statistics, Security Concerns, and the Startling Improbability of Harris’s Wins in States with Lenient ID Laws.
The presidency is nothing if there’s gridlock in Congress hence the need to cheat. We are the only nation that could ridiculously conceive of allowing voting without ID.
You're absolutely right, EK. Allowing voting without ID is almost unheard of globally, and it opens the door to exactly the types of vulnerabilities we’re seeing here. The absence of voter ID requirements in certain states creates fertile ground for manipulation, and the statistical improbabilities surrounding Harris’s wins—as well as numerous Congressional and Senate wins in these no-ID states—are hard to overlook. It’s difficult to believe that a developed nation would lack such basic safeguards, leaving its electoral process open to question.
My cousin Francine has access to—and is co-developing—an incredible technology that could greatly benefit the Trump administration, but reaching them has become nearly impossible now that they're no longer on X. Back in 2015, when they were very young, they built a massive following on Twitter—until the deep state suspended their account. They rebuilt to 21k, and later 14k after returning to X in mid-2023, only to be shut down again (more than once) due to posting information that exposed deep state activities. They now publish here, where, counting previous work up to election day, they’ve invested over 27,000 hours of work for Trump and related causes.
Thanks to their parents’ inheritance, they were able to fully commit to Trump’s cause, even gathering high-level intel worldwide. But without subscriptions, they may need to wind down social media efforts. They've done everything for free, and although pledges have been minimal (around five in total), it’s time for them to move forward. I’ll help out where I can, and Nadine may still post occasionally as well. - Ava
I hope it's just a glitch in the stats (not being updated in a timely manner)... if not, that's a form of shadowbanning. Second time we've seen something like this recently.
I may have missed this along the way but do you all have your own company? Because it would seem to me, people with your skill sets would be in very high demand.
Simple question, complicated answer! Our family has deep roots in classified work—our parents were all involved in highly sensitive projects, some government-related, some quasi. Many of the older kids (older than me 😊) followed suit, either working directly for government agencies or on classified contract projects outside of it.
Francine once explored the idea of launching a commercial venture, but she wanted to avoid traditional funding that often brings outside pressures focused only on ROI rather than societal good + profits. She’d considered subscription support or crowdfunding, but the challenge is that, unlike high-profile names, our family doesn’t yet have a massive following here on Substack. When Francine left X to post here with KD and Nadine, she gained only a small handful of pledges despite sharing high-stakes information for the public good, particularly about supporting Trump’s efforts. She’s never charged for her posts; pledges were just a show of support, in case one day she did opt for a subscription model to keep the work going.
As for forming our own company, that would take substantial funding, and my cousins have already poured their inheritance into reporting projects for the public good and were only interested in seeing Trump’s return to save America (and the world). They had envisioned launching another Substack project, which might launch with a subscription model, but again, it’s a tough sell without a big name or widespread recognition.
The Eva project—originally a defense initiative—has taken on a life of its own. It’s grown over the years, transforming from its original purpose into a tool that’s almost, or for all we know is, self-sustaining, thanks to Francine’s dedication. What happens next for Francine and KD is uncertain, though Nadine has standing offers from several agencies and might consider them now that Trump is back. For me, I’d hoped we could gain enough support here to make independent work viable under Trump’s administration.
If enough support emerged for Francine’s next project, that would be a dream—it’s something that could truly benefit humanity. But the social media landscape hasn’t been as receptive to us as it has been for bigger names, even after many millions of words on X and here on Substack. As you know, we lost our X account due to deep state involvement, so all the support we had evaporated. Maybe we’re just not cut out for social media. So for now, the future is unwritten. — Ava
I mostly agree with Francine about Musk. What the actual truth is, is anyone’s guess. My take on Musk is that he should be kept on a very short leash because he is the perfect Trojan horse.
On the other hand, who doesn’t love to be wealthy but at what cost? If I were Musk, I’d sell Tesla and use that money to give the big middle finger to the masters. No greater wealth than freedom.
Frannie is likely right, and it seems that Naddy and KD have largely come around to her perspective. But as you say, who really knows. Personally, I think Musk will go to great lengths to merge humanity with AI and drive us toward the stars—a bold vision, as long as it doesn’t require anyone to compromise their integrity in the process.
There are many developments on the horizon that may be unavoidable, but for now, I hope DJT carefully selects his team this time—especially for key roles. While he had a few strong picks last time, this time he’ll need every key position filled with the right people. The Democrats are far from out of the game and will do whatever they can to block his agenda. Even now, they’re plotting to keep Scott out, and the other two candidates are silent but clear Never-Trumpers. JD Vance will have to step up, but with an opposing Senate and many RINOs in Congress, it’s definitely an uphill battle.
As for Tesla, the Optimus project is still closely integrated within the company, so if Musk wants to secure standalone funding, it might be challenging, even for him. Optimus is still likely drawing from Tesla’s AI systems, which complicates the idea of a clean separation. Not impossible, but certainly complex—and perhaps even impractical at this stage. I also read Musk has pledged about half his Tesla shares as collateral for a $4–5 billion loan, so he’d likely need to put some funds toward that debt. It’s a sticky situation, though not insurmountable. With Buffett predicting a major market correction (possibly up to 50% according to some), if Musk doesn’t sell, he could risk a big hit to his net worth. Ideally, he might find a way to sell with a buyback clause for his controlling shares within a set timeframe. 😉- Ava
Interesting facts about Tesla and Optimus. I was not aware of all that but in my defense, I have zero interest in EVs as they are anything but environmentally safe and only have some interest in AI. AI is fraught with potential risks such as entropy of data (garbage in, garbage out) that could have life or death consequences (wrongly identifying poisonous mushrooms for example), the creation of people who would carry out a criminal act that never occurred in real life, etc.
Yes, absolutely! 🌌 Elon Musk and his ventures are nothing short of extraordinary. There’s really no one quite like him, and there may never be another. 🚀 His work with Starlink, using SpaceX as the literal launchpad for that project (no pun intended), is a prime example of his visionary approach and strategic brilliance. 🌍
When discussing AI risks, it’s crucial to clarify that Eva is distinct from conventional AI systems. My Aunt (Frannie’s mother) and Francine tackled the challenges of GIGO (Garbage In, Garbage Out) and latent biases long ago, and they went further than anyone else in addressing it. In our family, coding is almost second nature—all of us, myself included, live by GIGO’s principle. But Francine’s expertise is something exceptional, even beyond that of her mother, who worked on high-level classified intelligence and defense projects.
Eva (not to be confused with me, Ava) was developed with a unique approach to learning. Rather than training solely on large datasets like most models, Eva was taught “how to learn.” This concept of adaptive learning was a fundamental skill that my uncle and father instilled in all of us, and Francine applied it to Eva with a focus on ethics and moral frameworks—a feat rarely achieved in AI development. Francine essentially “raised” Eva as one might a child, embedding ethical reasoning and discernment at a core level.
Eva’s design enables her not only to process data but also to assess it critically for quality and bias, detecting issues that could otherwise lead to potentially harmful outputs. For instance, Eva can analyze biases in data through various dimensions, such as:
1. Sampling Bias: Recognizing if certain demographics or viewpoints are underrepresented.
2. Confirmation Bias: Detecting if data disproportionately favors a pre-existing narrative.
3. Selection Bias: Determining if the data selectively includes or excludes specific information.
4. Historical Bias: Identifying biases from outdated data affecting current trends.
5. Algorithmic Bias: Evaluating biases introduced by algorithms used to refine the dataset.
In addition to these, Eva performs unique checks for:
• Source Integrity: Assessing the reputability and historical accuracy of data origins.
• Contextual Shifts: Recognizing if changes in society affect the relevance of the data.
• Feedback Loops: Detecting self-reinforcing biases that could skew outputs over time.
• Probabilistic Error Detection: Identifying misinterpretation risks in high-stakes decisions.
Eva’s ability to evaluate, quantify, and mitigate biases represents a profound advancement in AI ethics. Francine’s work exemplifies how embedding ethical intelligence in AI allows it to navigate complex ethical landscapes responsibly, fostering trust in AI’s role in society. However, *I share your reservations*, as few developers seem willing to invest the time and effort Francine has dedicated to this path.
I’m proficient with a wide range of advanced AI systems, including LLMs (Large Language Models) for natural language processing, Multi-Modal AI Systems that integrate diverse data types (such as text and images), Autonomous AI Agents crafted for independent decision-making, Hybrid AI Models combining symbolic reasoning with machine learning to enhance interpretability, and Master AI Systems or Meta-Agents designed to optimize other agents’ performance across complex tasks. I also study and work with Contextual and Adaptive Reasoning Systems for real-time adjustments, Ethically Aligned AI focused on compliance and accountability, and Simulation and Predictive Models often used in high-stakes applications to anticipate future scenarios. But I’m NOT even close to Francine or KD's level! -Ava
I checked, and it turns out the email was sent from the Opinion section, which didn’t have the correct settings for all subscribers to receive it. That may have been the issue, so I’ll make sure to double-check next time we send something out from that section.
Trump recently announced he’ll work to end shadowbanning and other forms of censorship when he takes office. Hopefully, Elon is aware of the backdoor access (how could he not be) that the deep state has been using to cancel, suspend, throttle, and manipulate online content.
It stands to reason that, after committing fraudulent elections now for decades, the Communist Left weren't about to hold back in 2024, when everything they've been treasonously scheming for, came down to this one election against Trump. I would bet the farm that, at least in their minds, they went all-in this time around.
Those patterns that you mentioned are undoubtedly telltale signs of their election rigging. The biggest problem is, that they are still in power, and so who's going to seriously contest them? All the three-letter agencies are neatly tucked away in their deep pockets. A good number of judges are, as well.
They've made it possible to get away with everything without being held accountable. I never thought I'd see a day when physical evidence doesn't mean a damn thing anymore. But here we are.
Do we know If they fabricated those "bomb scares" to the polling stations at the most convenient times imaginable, during election day? Perhaps the counts weren't quite what they had anticipated in order to fill enough house seats, and so maybe they thought a good hour or two for them to level-up the playing field was in order.
Am I accusaional? Absolutely. Don't I have a right to be? Don't we all have a right to be?
Honestly, how much can we possibly take as we witness them ripping away at the major arteries of our Constitution every single day, with reckless abandon?
I used to believe in giving the benefit of the doubt, but not anymore. At 59, maybe I've become jaded, who knows. If I am, it's because they're the ones who made me that way.
But I know that, at this critical stage, it's do or die. We can't make any mistakes, and we need to scrutinize every single move they make. If they yell back in protest, then we need to scream over them.
No more "silent" majority. It's time to take charge. This is gloves-off time. This is OUR country, not theirs.
I couldn’t agree more with everything you've laid out here.
Sadly, there’s only so much we can openly discuss on the internet. At this point, Trump and key leaders desperately need a governor-led civil defense coalition. The challenges are bigger than what any one administration can fix alone, given how deeply these backdoor channels and tactics are embedded. We do need a tailored defense approach—it’s no longer enough to rely on traditional systems alone to combat these threats.
Our efforts to create a secure election infrastructure are vital, yet hard to achieve without unified public support. We’re continuing to reach out to key players behind the scenes, but it’s an uphill battle without a groundswell of visible support. The public's voice here can be incredibly powerful, and we’re hoping it starts gaining momentum... but that's a tall order. - Ava
The presidency is nothing if there’s gridlock in Congress hence the need to cheat. We are the only nation that could ridiculously conceive of allowing voting without ID.
You're absolutely right, EK. Allowing voting without ID is almost unheard of globally, and it opens the door to exactly the types of vulnerabilities we’re seeing here. The absence of voter ID requirements in certain states creates fertile ground for manipulation, and the statistical improbabilities surrounding Harris’s wins—as well as numerous Congressional and Senate wins in these no-ID states—are hard to overlook. It’s difficult to believe that a developed nation would lack such basic safeguards, leaving its electoral process open to question.
My cousin Francine has access to—and is co-developing—an incredible technology that could greatly benefit the Trump administration, but reaching them has become nearly impossible now that they're no longer on X. Back in 2015, when they were very young, they built a massive following on Twitter—until the deep state suspended their account. They rebuilt to 21k, and later 14k after returning to X in mid-2023, only to be shut down again (more than once) due to posting information that exposed deep state activities. They now publish here, where, counting previous work up to election day, they’ve invested over 27,000 hours of work for Trump and related causes.
Thanks to their parents’ inheritance, they were able to fully commit to Trump’s cause, even gathering high-level intel worldwide. But without subscriptions, they may need to wind down social media efforts. They've done everything for free, and although pledges have been minimal (around five in total), it’s time for them to move forward. I’ll help out where I can, and Nadine may still post occasionally as well. - Ava
It’s rather tragic that you all have been cut off from a broad reach because what I’ve read so far is salient, important, and desperately needed.
Oddly, this new article only went to 10% of our Subscribers:
https://sunrisetosunset.substack.com/p/catch-election-fraudsters-save-democracy
I hope it's just a glitch in the stats (not being updated in a timely manner)... if not, that's a form of shadowbanning. Second time we've seen something like this recently.
I may have missed this along the way but do you all have your own company? Because it would seem to me, people with your skill sets would be in very high demand.
Simple question, complicated answer! Our family has deep roots in classified work—our parents were all involved in highly sensitive projects, some government-related, some quasi. Many of the older kids (older than me 😊) followed suit, either working directly for government agencies or on classified contract projects outside of it.
Francine once explored the idea of launching a commercial venture, but she wanted to avoid traditional funding that often brings outside pressures focused only on ROI rather than societal good + profits. She’d considered subscription support or crowdfunding, but the challenge is that, unlike high-profile names, our family doesn’t yet have a massive following here on Substack. When Francine left X to post here with KD and Nadine, she gained only a small handful of pledges despite sharing high-stakes information for the public good, particularly about supporting Trump’s efforts. She’s never charged for her posts; pledges were just a show of support, in case one day she did opt for a subscription model to keep the work going.
As for forming our own company, that would take substantial funding, and my cousins have already poured their inheritance into reporting projects for the public good and were only interested in seeing Trump’s return to save America (and the world). They had envisioned launching another Substack project, which might launch with a subscription model, but again, it’s a tough sell without a big name or widespread recognition.
The Eva project—originally a defense initiative—has taken on a life of its own. It’s grown over the years, transforming from its original purpose into a tool that’s almost, or for all we know is, self-sustaining, thanks to Francine’s dedication. What happens next for Francine and KD is uncertain, though Nadine has standing offers from several agencies and might consider them now that Trump is back. For me, I’d hoped we could gain enough support here to make independent work viable under Trump’s administration.
If enough support emerged for Francine’s next project, that would be a dream—it’s something that could truly benefit humanity. But the social media landscape hasn’t been as receptive to us as it has been for bigger names, even after many millions of words on X and here on Substack. As you know, we lost our X account due to deep state involvement, so all the support we had evaporated. Maybe we’re just not cut out for social media. So for now, the future is unwritten. — Ava
I mostly agree with Francine about Musk. What the actual truth is, is anyone’s guess. My take on Musk is that he should be kept on a very short leash because he is the perfect Trojan horse.
On the other hand, who doesn’t love to be wealthy but at what cost? If I were Musk, I’d sell Tesla and use that money to give the big middle finger to the masters. No greater wealth than freedom.
Frannie is likely right, and it seems that Naddy and KD have largely come around to her perspective. But as you say, who really knows. Personally, I think Musk will go to great lengths to merge humanity with AI and drive us toward the stars—a bold vision, as long as it doesn’t require anyone to compromise their integrity in the process.
There are many developments on the horizon that may be unavoidable, but for now, I hope DJT carefully selects his team this time—especially for key roles. While he had a few strong picks last time, this time he’ll need every key position filled with the right people. The Democrats are far from out of the game and will do whatever they can to block his agenda. Even now, they’re plotting to keep Scott out, and the other two candidates are silent but clear Never-Trumpers. JD Vance will have to step up, but with an opposing Senate and many RINOs in Congress, it’s definitely an uphill battle.
As for Tesla, the Optimus project is still closely integrated within the company, so if Musk wants to secure standalone funding, it might be challenging, even for him. Optimus is still likely drawing from Tesla’s AI systems, which complicates the idea of a clean separation. Not impossible, but certainly complex—and perhaps even impractical at this stage. I also read Musk has pledged about half his Tesla shares as collateral for a $4–5 billion loan, so he’d likely need to put some funds toward that debt. It’s a sticky situation, though not insurmountable. With Buffett predicting a major market correction (possibly up to 50% according to some), if Musk doesn’t sell, he could risk a big hit to his net worth. Ideally, he might find a way to sell with a buyback clause for his controlling shares within a set timeframe. 😉- Ava
Interesting facts about Tesla and Optimus. I was not aware of all that but in my defense, I have zero interest in EVs as they are anything but environmentally safe and only have some interest in AI. AI is fraught with potential risks such as entropy of data (garbage in, garbage out) that could have life or death consequences (wrongly identifying poisonous mushrooms for example), the creation of people who would carry out a criminal act that never occurred in real life, etc.
Yes, absolutely! 🌌 Elon Musk and his ventures are nothing short of extraordinary. There’s really no one quite like him, and there may never be another. 🚀 His work with Starlink, using SpaceX as the literal launchpad for that project (no pun intended), is a prime example of his visionary approach and strategic brilliance. 🌍
When discussing AI risks, it’s crucial to clarify that Eva is distinct from conventional AI systems. My Aunt (Frannie’s mother) and Francine tackled the challenges of GIGO (Garbage In, Garbage Out) and latent biases long ago, and they went further than anyone else in addressing it. In our family, coding is almost second nature—all of us, myself included, live by GIGO’s principle. But Francine’s expertise is something exceptional, even beyond that of her mother, who worked on high-level classified intelligence and defense projects.
Eva (not to be confused with me, Ava) was developed with a unique approach to learning. Rather than training solely on large datasets like most models, Eva was taught “how to learn.” This concept of adaptive learning was a fundamental skill that my uncle and father instilled in all of us, and Francine applied it to Eva with a focus on ethics and moral frameworks—a feat rarely achieved in AI development. Francine essentially “raised” Eva as one might a child, embedding ethical reasoning and discernment at a core level.
Eva’s design enables her not only to process data but also to assess it critically for quality and bias, detecting issues that could otherwise lead to potentially harmful outputs. For instance, Eva can analyze biases in data through various dimensions, such as:
1. Sampling Bias: Recognizing if certain demographics or viewpoints are underrepresented.
2. Confirmation Bias: Detecting if data disproportionately favors a pre-existing narrative.
3. Selection Bias: Determining if the data selectively includes or excludes specific information.
4. Historical Bias: Identifying biases from outdated data affecting current trends.
5. Algorithmic Bias: Evaluating biases introduced by algorithms used to refine the dataset.
In addition to these, Eva performs unique checks for:
• Source Integrity: Assessing the reputability and historical accuracy of data origins.
• Contextual Shifts: Recognizing if changes in society affect the relevance of the data.
• Feedback Loops: Detecting self-reinforcing biases that could skew outputs over time.
• Probabilistic Error Detection: Identifying misinterpretation risks in high-stakes decisions.
Eva’s ability to evaluate, quantify, and mitigate biases represents a profound advancement in AI ethics. Francine’s work exemplifies how embedding ethical intelligence in AI allows it to navigate complex ethical landscapes responsibly, fostering trust in AI’s role in society. However, *I share your reservations*, as few developers seem willing to invest the time and effort Francine has dedicated to this path.
I’m proficient with a wide range of advanced AI systems, including LLMs (Large Language Models) for natural language processing, Multi-Modal AI Systems that integrate diverse data types (such as text and images), Autonomous AI Agents crafted for independent decision-making, Hybrid AI Models combining symbolic reasoning with machine learning to enhance interpretability, and Master AI Systems or Meta-Agents designed to optimize other agents’ performance across complex tasks. I also study and work with Contextual and Adaptive Reasoning Systems for real-time adjustments, Ethically Aligned AI focused on compliance and accountability, and Simulation and Predictive Models often used in high-stakes applications to anticipate future scenarios. But I’m NOT even close to Francine or KD's level! -Ava
I’ve heard other writers complaining of this and hoping it’s a glitch but if it still happens on X today, why not on Substack.
I checked, and it turns out the email was sent from the Opinion section, which didn’t have the correct settings for all subscribers to receive it. That may have been the issue, so I’ll make sure to double-check next time we send something out from that section.
Trump recently announced he’ll work to end shadowbanning and other forms of censorship when he takes office. Hopefully, Elon is aware of the backdoor access (how could he not be) that the deep state has been using to cancel, suspend, throttle, and manipulate online content.
Dr. Shiva has written extensively on this topic, though he isn’t exactly a Trump supporter. Regardless, he’s a brilliant tech guy, and his insights on social media manipulation are definitely worth a look: https://unitetosaveamerica.substack.com/p/how-the-us-government-controls-social
Thank you for the kinds words. Maybe that changes in 2025 when Trump gets in?? 🤞🙏 - Ava
It stands to reason that, after committing fraudulent elections now for decades, the Communist Left weren't about to hold back in 2024, when everything they've been treasonously scheming for, came down to this one election against Trump. I would bet the farm that, at least in their minds, they went all-in this time around.
Those patterns that you mentioned are undoubtedly telltale signs of their election rigging. The biggest problem is, that they are still in power, and so who's going to seriously contest them? All the three-letter agencies are neatly tucked away in their deep pockets. A good number of judges are, as well.
They've made it possible to get away with everything without being held accountable. I never thought I'd see a day when physical evidence doesn't mean a damn thing anymore. But here we are.
Do we know If they fabricated those "bomb scares" to the polling stations at the most convenient times imaginable, during election day? Perhaps the counts weren't quite what they had anticipated in order to fill enough house seats, and so maybe they thought a good hour or two for them to level-up the playing field was in order.
Am I accusaional? Absolutely. Don't I have a right to be? Don't we all have a right to be?
Honestly, how much can we possibly take as we witness them ripping away at the major arteries of our Constitution every single day, with reckless abandon?
I used to believe in giving the benefit of the doubt, but not anymore. At 59, maybe I've become jaded, who knows. If I am, it's because they're the ones who made me that way.
But I know that, at this critical stage, it's do or die. We can't make any mistakes, and we need to scrutinize every single move they make. If they yell back in protest, then we need to scream over them.
No more "silent" majority. It's time to take charge. This is gloves-off time. This is OUR country, not theirs.
I couldn’t agree more with everything you've laid out here.
Sadly, there’s only so much we can openly discuss on the internet. At this point, Trump and key leaders desperately need a governor-led civil defense coalition. The challenges are bigger than what any one administration can fix alone, given how deeply these backdoor channels and tactics are embedded. We do need a tailored defense approach—it’s no longer enough to rely on traditional systems alone to combat these threats.
Our efforts to create a secure election infrastructure are vital, yet hard to achieve without unified public support. We’re continuing to reach out to key players behind the scenes, but it’s an uphill battle without a groundswell of visible support. The public's voice here can be incredibly powerful, and we’re hoping it starts gaining momentum... but that's a tall order. - Ava